It’s not child “porn”. It’s child rape.

Unfashionista

Image

The loathsome comments of the former Crimewatch presenter, Nick Ross, coupled with earlier rape apologism, made at the Hay festival, that he would watch images of a child being raped out of “curiosity” are hard to fathom:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/10094749/Id-probably-watch-child-porn-admits-former-Crimwwatch-presenter-Nick-Ross.html

“We’re all inquisitive,” he said. “I had never seen, until I started working on Crimewatch, child pornography.

“I think if someone came to me and said: ‘Would you like to see what all the fuss is about?’, I’m sorry, I probably would say yes.”

What the fuss is about? A child being raped, you mean? And you would watch that to satisfy your curiosity?

(In the same piece, he is quoted as saying that West Indians are more likely to mug people because they are not very good at pickpocketing, which is a white crime).

OK, you say, so Nick Ross has followed the earlier rape apologism of his book by going…

View original post 637 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s